Comment on this post ›

COMMENTS (1)

1
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
     
1
Page size:
PageSizeComboBox
select
 HBKisGODHBKisGODHeavy Weight Champion7 years agoLikeReply
 
nice blog and I agree pretty much with the formula .But wrestling is heavily formula based and will always be .If they have more than 4 weeks to build up a ppv expect more nonesense like arm wrestling ,posing competitions,debates and even a dance off in today's world .


Less Boring and scripted promos-I will say let wrestlers come up with their own stuff .Give them pointers ,don't give them a page full of crap they r supposed to rehearse like actors and then puke it all out on tv .It was highly successful earlier,I donno how it can fail today.

Less of a gm presence-It is pretty less really,the Raw gm message hardly is for 4 mins.

More matches and longer matches-I do not agree on more matches ,Raw is already crammed up with a lot of 4 min matches .Longer matches ,yes for sure a big yes.


Most importantly of all... FEWER PPVs-I don't really feel the need to reduce the number of ppvs.I know nobody agrees with me on this point,but I would rather see split ppvs again ,Raw having it's own set of ppvs and ditto for Smackdown .It allows time to build the fueds and forces writers to come up with 7 matches .It's easier with both brands appearing ,there r 6 titles already ,6 title matches and u have a ppv.

Title Unifcation-I don't like the unifcation idea .Having one title is ok when u have a 30 man roster ,not when u have a 80 man roster .It just doesn't work in today's scenario with the brand split.




Twitter
Comment on this post ›